in Search

USA Cricketer

November 2011 - Posts

  • USA Cricket: Lack of long term vision results in team chaperones, not coaches

    Now, you can get all the USA Cricket updates via Facebook.   Also follow us on Twitter via @dreamcricket

    By Peter Della Penna

    The recent failure of the USA Women’s team to qualify for the 2013 ICC Women’s World Cup was not unexpected. The final team was whipped up at the last minute after a series of disputes with the original squad. Even with a full strength squad, they would have had only a marginally better chance at gaining ODI status, let alone World Cup qualification.

    In an attempt to gloss over some of the negative attention garnered from the player disputes, USACA announced that Robin Singh would be the head coach for the women's team in Bangladesh. A coach works with a team locally and on a regular basis, develops strategies and philosophies that can be structured through practice sessions before being utilized in games. This is not what USACA's arrangement with Robin Singh has yielded for US cricket. 

    To say Robin Singh has coached the USA U-19 or the USA Women’s team is not really the best way to characterize his position within US cricket. Singh spent a grand total of two weeks inside the USA alongside the U-19 team during the ICC Americas U-19 tournament in February and then the four-match series against the West Indies U-19 in July before serving as head coach at the ICC U-19 World Cup Qualifier in Ireland. USACA has not been able to retain his services in between tournaments. As a result, he is not in the US to work with players and help them focus on developing the necessary skills and approaches to improve. If he’s only present to watch over a team in a tournament, then USACA has only acquired a chaperone and perhaps a mentor, but not a coach. Whatever amount USACA paid for the services of such a high-profile coach, it cannot be justified in the face of such myopic thinking.

    Robin Singh is not the only chaperone that US cricket has had recently.  Milton Pydanna was enlisted as a chaperone for the USA U-15 team on their trip to Canada in August. The teenagers who were picked to play for USA had never seen the man before and may never see him again.

    Image (right) - Robin Singh [Courtesy: Peter Della Penna/DreamCricket.com]

    Mark Johnson had no prior coaching involvement with the USA men’s team before assuming a role as the men’s chaperone for the ICC Americas Twenty20 tournament in July. In August, USACA hastily arranged for a team to go to Canada to play in a four-team Twenty20 tournament followed by a two-day match against Canada for the K.A. Auty Cup. Howard Johnson took charge as chaperone for that team for a few days, then went back to Florida.

    Prior to them, Clayton Lambert served in that capacity. Lambert had a decent knowledge of players in the USA structure, but he hardly had an opportunity to implement any sort of plan with any of the men’s teams because he was only able to work with them for the odd two or three-day selection camp prior to accompanying them to ICC tournaments.

    Dipak Patel was brought in to assist the 2010 U-19 team in New Zealand. He had to leave before the team started playing tournament matches at the ICC U-19 World Cup because USACA couldn’t afford his services or made other plans. He returned a few weeks later to accompany the men’s team for matches in the UAE and in Nepal, but was never seen again.

    It doesn’t matter if it’s Singh, Patel, Lambert, the Johnsons, Pydanna or John Buchanan, paying someone for a tours only assignment is just as good as lighting the money on fire. It does nothing for development.

    If USACA wants to improve future results it should focus on developing local coaches and overall infrastructure to a higher standard. One of the reasons why the administration resorts to a desperate ploy of paying for a foreign coach to do a one-off appearance is because the local coaches are deemed to be inferior and incapable of raising the standards of play for the national teams. Paying an arm and a leg for someone to spend one or two weeks with a team and then disappear is not going to raise the standard of the national teams either.

    USACA does not do much to get local coaches the training they need to improve but this has to change in order for the playing standards to improve. If the money used on Singh was spent on training 15 or 20 local coaches to improve their coaching methods, it would have a trickle-down effect on improving the players. Money needs to be invested in the people who work with players day in and day out.

    Cricket in America is still entrenched in amateurism. Once USA's amateur players have hit a ceiling with the amount of improvement they can receive from better trained local coaches using legitimate cricket facilities, a high-priced professional coach will become necessary and worthwhile. That day is still a long way off.

    If USACA wants to pay a professional a significant amount of money to be a national team coach, that person has to be here 365 days a year working with players and coaches at all levels in the various regions of the country in order for stakeholders to get the full value and benefit of what they have to offer. If that person is not willing to make such a commitment of their time and energy, USACA should not be willing to make such a commitment with its scarce financial resources.

  • Former Cricket Canada CEO Atul Ahuja to run for USACA President

    Now, you can get all the USA Cricket updates via Facebook.   Also follow us on Twitter via @dreamcricket

    By Peter Della Penna

    Atul Ahuja, the 44-year-old former CEO of Cricket Canada, has thrown his hat into the ring of candidates to become the next president of the USA Cricket Association. Ahuja first broke the news earlier this month in a series of emails to cricket stakeholders and says he is different from other candidates because he has walked the walk where others in US cricket have only talked the talk.

    “I’ve done a lot of things that a lot of people have hoped to do here,” said Ahuja in a phone interview. “I’ve seen the life cycle of how it can be done, what are the opportunities, what are the trials and tribulations, what it takes. That’s one. Secondly, I believe that excellence is a human trait that many people strive for and few achieve. The team I’ve put together is one that has achieved a lot of excellence.”

    Ahuja has put together a slate of candidates for other positions on the executive board of USACA as well. So far he has revealed that former West Indies Test batsman Alvin Kallicharran will be running alongside Ahuja to be first vice president, former Bangladesh allrounder Yousuf Rezaur Rahman will run for secretary and US cricket historian David Sentance will run for treasurer. Ahuja says he decided to run because he feels he can be a difference maker in US cricket.

    “Most people, if you look back at history, that try to make a difference, they try to make a difference because they believe that they can and they believe there’s a need to make a difference,” said Ahuja. “The combination of can and recognizing there’s a need, that creates a desire to make a difference. I believe that there’s a need to make a difference, there’s a need to bring change. I believe that there’s a lot of talent. I believe it’s a huge market. The United States epitomizes sports management globally. We have the best of sports psychologists, sports medicine, facilities, you name it. If we’re able to leverage all that’s there, we can create a world class cricket system.”

    When asked what it was like dealing with USACA as Cricket Canada’s CEO, Ahuja says his interactions were limited.

    Image (right) - Atul Ahuja

    “US Cricket was in a different place,” said Ahuja. “It still did not have One-Day International status so that kind of did not allow Canada to play One-Day cricket with the United States and the best you could potentially do was play friendly cricket. Being in Canada at the time, my focus was that if we have One-Day status, then we should play with other countries that have One -Day status and preferably countries that are at a higher level so that our team constantly was challenged and it helped develop the players for the upcoming, at that point, World Cup Qualifier.”

    Ahuja says the accomplishment he was most proud of in his time as Cricket Canada’s CEO was getting four Full Member nations to play on Canadian soil.

    “For the first time ever we had four Full Member countries come to play Canada on Canadian soil. We had the West Indies come and play us, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. To be able to get four Full Member boards to take an Associate nation seriously I think was the biggest accomplishment.” He also listed Cricket Canada’s sponsorship with Scotiabank as another highlight of his tenure.

    In order for the USA to get to the same level as Canada in Division One of the Associate nations and the ODI status that comes with it, Ahuja says that high performance systems need to be put in place and part of that is creating a pathway to allow for such a system to succeed.

    “We need to take cricket out into the mainstream,” said Ahuja. “We need to create cricket moms, not just soccer moms. So how do we do that? How do we have cricket outreach programs? So I’m putting in place a cricket outreach program. A schools program and a cricket outreach program are extremely important to make sure that we are constantly feeding children into the system and that helps in various ways. The more kids we have playing cricket, the more people that cricket touches, the better the chance is for us to go out and get a sponsorship for these programs. Sponsorships are very numbers based. So if a corporate sponsor comes in and they believe that there’s 100,000 kids that play cricket or have interest in cricket, you’ll find that the sponsorship dollars are pretty much in line with the numbers that play the game.”

    When asked how he planned on getting league presidents to commit to grassroots development when little interest has been shown toward doing so by league administrators in recent history, Ahuja responded, “I have faith in the fact that what has been demonstrated globally, most people tend to adapt to it.”

    “If you follow any professional high performance pathway that’s worked and demonstrated globally, any sport that’s grown in a country that does not traditionally play it, let’s look at skiing in Australia. That’s a sport that’s really not on the national scene in Australia, but it’s a sport that has actually grown. They’ve got some world class skiers in Australia, Olympic level skiers in Australia. Let’s take soccer in the United States. In any high performance pathway, building from the ground up is essential. That’s proven and that’s the way to do it and that’s what we’re going to do.”

    In terms of revamping the USACA governance structure, Ahuja says he would advocate a one term limit for the role of USACA president.

    “It’s very important that anybody in a leadership position goes in there to leave a legacy and it shouldn’t be a case of they don’t leave at all which is what we see a lot of. That shouldn’t happen. A refresh every few years is very good for the system. It makes it more inclusive. You’ll find there’s a lot more stakeholders in the system that will feel motivated to come in and contribute and participate,” said Ahuja. “A lot of people ask me, ‘But the US President serves two terms.’ I say the day our cricket system is as mature as the United States government, we can relook at that but at the moment the president should serve one term and he or she should be focused on leaving a legacy in that one term. The board members could potentially serve three terms, two or three terms, that’s the executive committee and that’s fine because you need some continuity. We need to make sure the organization is bigger than the individual.”

    Asked for his thoughts on the delays in the USACA elections, Ahuja said that it has damaged USACA’s credibility, something that he hopes to restore if he gets a chance to serve as president.

    “I think we need to bring integrity back into the system,” said Ahuja. “For any individual to have credibility, to be believed, you need to build trust. You need to build integrity and it’s very important to build trust. How do you build trust? You build trust when you do what you say you’ll do. My way of building trust is that if this election was supposed to happen at a particular point in time, it should have. Now if the goalpost has been moved, then there better be a good reason but yet again it’s a question of trust and what happens is that people will only put up with a lack of trust until a point in time.”

    Ahuja is originally from Pune, India and now lives in Atlanta where he is the president and CEO of an IT firm. He first came to the USA in 1999 when he moved to Los Angeles. While there, he was a member of British & Dominion Cricket Club in the SCCA until 2002 when he moved to Toronto. Ahuja was hired as Cricket Canada’s CEO in November of 2007 but was fired without cause in January 2009. He says he does not believe the way his time ended with Cricket Canada will have any negative effect on his run for USACA President, saying that it is up to the voters to decide who is best.

    “I have been an ardent guardian of the game and a catalyst for its growth,” said Ahuja, “and I’ve demonstrated it.”

  • USA Cricket: Dutch young guns too much as USA loses by 225 runs at ICC Women's WC Qualifier

    Now, you can get all the USA Cricket updates via Facebook.   Also follow us on Twitter via @dreamcricket

    By Peter Della Penna

    Scorecard powered by New Inning Foundation

    The Netherlands opener Miranda Veringmeier stroked 99 to help her side to an insurmountable total of 329 for 5 on the way to a 225-run win over USA on Thursday at the 2011 ICC Women’s World Cup Qualifier in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The 19-year-old Veringmeier was named player of the match for her efforts, which included a 118-run stand for the second wicket with the Netherlands captain Helmien Rambaldo. USA remains winless at 0-2 with the loss while the Netherlands moves to 2-1.

    The Netherlands won the toss and elected to bat first as USA conceded the second highest total of the tournament and the highest by an Associate team at the event. South Africa’s total of 343 for 5 against USA on Tuesday is the highest team score so far in the qualifier. Veringmeier and Denise Hannema added 48 for the first wicket until their partnership was ended when USA captain Doris Francis ran out Hannema for 17 in the 12th over.

    From there, USA’s bowlers failed to make an impact as Rambaldo and Veringmeier combined for one of two century partnerships on the day for the Dutch side. Veringmeier appeared well on her way to a ton but was denied by Samantha Ramautar, who bowled the teenager just a run short of reaching the coveted three-figure milestone to make it 166 for 2 in the 32nd over. Rambaldo was given lbw for 41 five overs later as Ramautar claimed her second scalp to make it 190 for 3.

    USA failed to exert pressure with the fall of wickets though as Esther Lanser joined Kerry-Anne Tomlinson at the wicket and the two gave the innings a rapid acceleration, posting 110 runs for the fourth wicket in just 12.1 overs. By comparison, the 118-run stand between Rambaldo and Veringmeier spanned 19.5 overs. The Netherlands ended the 38th over with the score at 201 for 3, but less than 10 overs later they’d reached 300 when Lanser hit her seventh boundary. It brought up her half-century in just 41 balls, but one delivery later she was bowled by Claudine Beckford.

    The 21-year-old Tomlinson kept motoring along without her as the Netherlands wound up adding 109 runs in the final 10 overs, including 51 in the final five. Tomlinson reached her 50 in the 45th over off just 42 balls with seven fours and a six. She fell in the last over to Beckford for 80 off 58 balls, finishing with 10 boundaries and a six in her brisk knock.

    Beckford was introduced for the first time in the 46th over and despite taking two wickets proved very expensive, giving away 31 runs in three overs. Ramautar finished with 2 for 55 in her 10 while opening pacer Triholder Marshall was the most economical bowler for USA with figures of 0 for 52 in 10. Two days after giving away just nine wides and 19 extras overall to South Africa, USA contributed 23 wides and 33 extras to the Netherlands.

    USA demonstrated determination by grinding their way to 145 against a Full Member nation on Tuesday, but took a step back on Thursday batting against an Associate attack. Tomlinson showed just as much skill with the ball by removing both USA openers, Durga Das and Nadia Gruny, inside the first eight overs for 5 and 7 respectively to make it 17 for 2. Shebani Bhaskar came to the crease and scored 19 runs in a 28-run stand with Francis before she was dismissed by off-spinner Esther Lanser who struck again four balls later to remove Joan Alexander for a duck. Lanser continued to put the clamps down on USA’s lineup by bowling five maidens in her 10-over spell. Along the way she had Francis stumped for 12 to make it 57 for 5 in the 22nd over.

    Erica Rendler joined Marshall to produce a 29-run stand for the sixth wicket. The partnership was the longest of the tournament for USA in terms of deliveries faced as the pair shared the crease for 21.4 overs. While the two women kept the Dutch attack at bay, they also struggled to score runs as the maidens continued to pile up. The Netherlands bowled 16 maidens in all, four more than South Africa tallied against the USA. USA’s bowlers have managed just one maiden in two games.

    The partnership ended when Marshall gave a return catch to off-spinner Esther de Lange to make it 86 for 6 at the end of 43 overs. Ramautar lasted two deliveries before she was bowled by de Lange and Rendler fell to the same bowler at the start of the 47th for 15. Rendler and Bhaskar, the only two American-born players in the squad, wound up with USA’s highest scores off the bat in the match. Still, they were outdone by extras which contributed 29 to USA’s total.

    Tomlinson came back late for a second spell and trapped Sara Farooq lbw for a duck to make it 94 for 9 in the 48th over. Beckford was run out by Veringmeier for 4 to seal the innings with one ball left unused as USA was bowled out for 104 in 49.5 overs. de Lange finished with the best figures for the Netherlands, taking 3 for 8 in 10 overs with five maidens. Lanser finished with 3 for 11 while Tomlinson took 3 for 21.

    In the other match in Group A on Thursday, Sri Lanka beat Zimbabwe by seven wickets. Sri Lanka sent Zimbabwe in to bat and wound up bowling them out for 62 in 41.4 overs before chasing the target in 10.5 overs. The Netherlands had a near identical experience against Sri Lanka in their encounter on Tuesday when they were bowled out for 61 in 41.3 overs before losing by seven wickets.

    USA’s next match is against Zimbabwe on Friday at the Shere Bangla National Stadium. The match will be televised live on Bangladesh local television channel ATN Bangla beginning at 10 pm EST in America.

  • USA Cricket: Fraser claims women's stance was about respect, not money

    Now, you can get all the USA Cricket updates via Facebook.   Also follow us on Twitter via @dreamcricket

    By Peter Della Penna

    Former USA women’s team head coach Linden Fraser says that the dispute which arose in the original 18-player squad for the ICC Women’s World Cup Qualifier was borne out of a lack of respect shown to the women.

    “The whole thing I’ve been seeing that the women has been holding USACA to ransom, that this thing is all about the money, that’s a total fabrication of the truth,” said Fraser in a recent interview. “Yes, the money is a part of it, but the money is not the main issue. The main issue these women have with the board, or I should say Dainty who happens to be President who is making all the decisions, they feel they’re not being treated properly by the board. They felt that they were being treated like second class citizens and I can agree with them on that.”

    Fraser denies rumors circulating that he instructed women to demand that they would not play if Fraser was not the coach. He says that he was cast aside for standing up to the administration on behalf of the women and also for asking to be paid for his coaching position.

    “This thing about me being the coach was because I stood up for the women because I felt the women was not being treated properly,” said Fraser. “They were being thrown into the wilderness and nobody cared about them and I stood up for that. I know I would have been taken out as the coach because it happened before. This is not the first time it has happened under Dainty’s leadership.”

    “I was told it should be an honor for me to coach the USA team. They told me I should go and coach the US team for free. Hell no. I’ve been doing that since I’ve been in the US, doing stuff without getting paid for it and I realized that they have other people nowhere near as qualified as me coach the national team and are being paid to do that.”

    Image (right) - Linden Fraser [Courtesy: Peter Della Penna/DreamCricket.com]

    Fraser says that the women initially began to feel let down over the summer when it became apparent that USACA was not going to be able to follow through on having the three training camps that were promised to them prior to traveling to Bangladesh for the qualifier. According to Fraser, there was enough money in a proposed budget for the usage of a $100,000 grant from The Apple Pickers Foundation to allow for three camps. He blames the fact that three camps did not happen on financial mismanagement by USACA and does not entirely believe that the 10-day camp to Barbados cost $63,000 as quoted by former USACA Cricket Committee chairman Krish Prasad.

    Of the players who were originally in the squad, the only ones who did not go to Bangladesh were from the Tri-State Lynx team which Fraser coaches. Fraser denies that there was a rift between Lynx and non-Lynx players, but acknowledges that there were problems that developed on the Barbados tour which he did not want to discuss. According to several sources, manager Louise Browne-Jackson wrote a tour report which was highly critical of Fraser for his handling of players both on and off the field. “We’re in the 21st century and things that used to happen back when the manager were playing don’t happen now,” said Fraser.

    When asked if he felt the women in the squad should have shown more solidarity in their stance with the stipend, Fraser said it was up to each individual player to do what was best for themselves. A letter was sent to USACA and signed by 15 players asking for stipends equivalent to what men’s players receive. Several of the players who signed that letter wound up being selected, including new captain Doris Francis. “They all said they were sticking together, but I don’t know what happened,” said Fraser.

    The former women’s coach also says that the women all pledged to go to Bangladesh during a conference call with Andy Pick several days before the squad was announced. The players also apparently had a conference call with USACA President Gladstone Dainty which Fraser claims to have listened in on during which he says Dainty told the players that the team would be picked by then captain Candacy Atkins and two of the coaches, Mark Johnson and Howard Johnson, who supervised last month’s camp in Florida. Instead, he claims an entirely different squad was announced with all but two Lynx players – Nadia Gruny and Shebani Bhaskar – replaced. Fraser felt the original squad had a realistic chance of qualifying for the 2013 ICC Women’s World Cup, but says that the recent decisions of the administration have “pushed women’s cricket 20 years back.”

    “I know all these women that has been selected,” said Fraser. “Bangladesh is not a joke and this team that we have here going to Bangladesh? I’m sorry it’s embarrassing, very very embarrassing. I’m not gonna take away anything from none of the women but it’s a big big embarrassment. There were seven players in the original team that are not there and those are seven of the best players.”

    “As the ICC said, there’s no country in the Americas who can come up with a second XI team and that is exactly what’s happening here. With all due respect to them, they are all promising but not the level that is expected to play in a qualifier. They are promising, but they’re not at that level.”

    USA’s first match at the 2011 ICC Women’s World Cup Qualifier is against South Africa on Tuesday. South Africa beat Sri Lanka by six runs on the opening day of matches in Dhaka on Monday.


DreamCricket strongly disapproves of spam and we appreciate your taking the time to report this abuse to us so we can remove it accordingly. If you find any content or comments to be inappropriate, abusive or infringing other people's copyright please report it. To report abuse, please email us at content@dreamcricket.com.

This Blog

Syndication

Tags