Not Cricket


http://www.wikio.com web tracker
Listed in LS Blogs the Blog Directory and Blog Search Engine Sports Blogs - Blog Rankings Blog Directory TopBlogDir.blogspot.com button Cricket Blog Directory Visit blogadda.com to discover Indian blogs
Sports & Recreation Directory
Web Directory
Promote Your Blog
This site is listed on OmniCricket

Receive Email Updates

Can also be found at

contact me

Other big hitters I catch

Other non sporting blogs I read

Fine W(h)ining

We may see more such episodes in the coming future if the IPL continues to be ultra strict with its fines.

For poor KPXI it's USD 400k and counting. These are the issues where players need Player Associations to interject. Is Tim May listening?

Comments

Som said:

This is yet another Modi ploy to milk the franchise and the players. By the end of the exercise, players and franchisees would be confirmed BPL.

# March 30, 2010 11:35 PM

namya said:

Som,

Till now we have heard of farmers stuck in a debt trap.. IPL has a wonderful opportunity to start a lenders co-operative society where players can avail of loans at 36% :-)

# March 30, 2010 11:53 PM

straight point said:

hahaha... all i can say is the time is ripe... :)

# March 31, 2010 12:14 AM

Mahek said:

I don't mind the hefty fines one bit. If you have a problem, get on with the bloody game. T20 was supposed to be fast and teams actually have 85 minutes of bowl 20 overs (90 if you include the timeouts) instead of 80 minutes for international games.

# March 31, 2010 12:35 AM

namya said:

SP, it is indeed

Mahek,

Maybe you can read your captain's observations on the fines in today's papers :)

# March 31, 2010 12:57 AM

Jonathan said:

Mahek, it's actually 85 minutes <i>including</i> the two time outs - in other words, the same 80 minutes for the 20 overs.

# April 4, 2010 4:59 PM

namya said:

Jonathan,

welcome to the blog..

thanks for pointing out the correct time allotted to an innings.

I am all against time wasting on the cricket field but somehow the magnitude of the fines seems disproportionate. Gambhir had some valid reasons to offer to Mahek.. Can't find that link but had read it in his syndicated column in Hindustan Times.

cheers

# April 4, 2010 7:39 PM

Jonathan said:

Namya,

I think I've seen the reasons you refer to somewhere. There's definitely some questions to be asked about what sort of time allowance is good for the game (especially when 5 minutes of timeouts is considered ok!), but I don't think it's too unreasonable to expect players to keep to whatever rules are in place (as long as they are not blamed for delays they can't control).

The penalties are another matter... I don't think the ICC makes public the nominal match fees that their fines are based on, but the over rate fines definitely don't go up as much as the IPL ones do for second and third offences.

# April 6, 2010 12:05 AM

namya said:

Jonathan,

One of the basic requirements of T20 when it began was that it was played in the shortest possible time. So no complaints about the expectation to complete an innings in a set time frame.. But factors like noise in the stadium that a captain can't control should be considered while calculating the delay.

My primary concern though was the severity of the financial fines. You can ban a captain but asking him to pay USD 50k and USD 20k for all other players is not on. The punishment is not commensurate with the crime is all that I can say :)

cheers

# April 6, 2010 12:25 AM

Soulberry said:

It would be intereting to see if they maintain their high standards without bias or favour.

# April 7, 2010 3:19 AM

namya said:

SB,

for now Warne doesn't seem to be applied the same rules for dissent :)

# April 7, 2010 9:22 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)