Not Cricket

http://www.wikio.com web tracker
Listed in LS Blogs the Blog Directory and Blog Search Engine Sports Blogs - Blog Rankings Blog Directory TopBlogDir.blogspot.com button Cricket Blog Directory Visit blogadda.com to discover Indian blogs
Sports & Recreation Directory
Web Directory
Promote Your Blog
This site is listed on OmniCricket

Receive Email Updates

contact me

Other blogs

Other non sporting blogs I read

Bollywood alter egos of Cricketers - Part I

Given the general consensus among most Indians about Cricket and Bollywood being the unifying factors in an otherwise extremely diverse nation, one tried to find some similarities between the two sets of people that represent the two industries. To try to find the Bollywood alter ego of a cricketer is an interesting and rigorous exercise. It need not be a perfect fit. It will NOT be a perfect fit. So before one is inundated with the various differences between the two equated personalities, a statutory warning is warranted. The entire exercise needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.

One intends to start a series of such 'top of the mind' similarities between Cricketers and Bollywood actors. Instead of starting with the most obvious choice of a SRT or a SRK or the Big B, one felt it would do justice to start with the most unsung but invaluable characters of their time. Especially given the current selection flip flops (some flips mostly flops).

Rahul Dravid and Naseeruddin Shah.

Both have perennially underplayed their roles and have mostly been under appreciated in their respective professions.

Naseer started as an 'art film' guy. Dravid started as a technically almost perfect player, but without the flair. Both had perfected the basics of their respective professions but never had it in them to play to the gallery.

Naseer was never seriously considered as a 'commercial' movie actor in his early acting days. Dravid was never really thought of as a great 'ODI' player at the start of his career either.

Naseer got into 'mainstream' Cinema by the middle of his career. Dravid started to come into his own in limited overs cricket a bit late in his career as well.

Naseer's career coincided with Amitabh, Dravid happened to exist during SRT's reign. Even when Amitabh/SRT were replaced by SRK/Viru/Yuvi/MSD in the popularity stakes, the two would always remain ‘also rans’.

Naseer became famous commercially with Tridev (Three Gods), Dravid went on to be better known as one of the Fab four.

Naseer and Dravid were always better appreciated by the critics than the common fan. The fact that they rarely hammed like many others didn't really appeal to a fanatic Indian fan used to heavy duty dialogue and heavy hitting batters.

Dravid and Naseer both were successful in multi-starrers. They never really managed to carry a movie or a match on their lone shoulders. There were a few exceptions along the way like Jalwa but such sparkling solo performances were never consistent enough for them to be considered as super star material.

The number of roles enacted by the both has been numerous. They made their individuality subservient to the role they were playing and therein lay their greatness.

Rumour has it that a Director went to Naseer offering him Hamlet’s role in an upcoming movie. Shahrukh Khan was unwell and the Ranbir Kapoors of the world, he thought, weren’t really up to the task. Naseer accepted gracefully. After a few days shooting, SRK conveyed his availability to the director and Naseer was unceremoniously sacked from the movie just at the time when he was mouthing, “To be or not to be”.

Or is one mixing it up with Rahul Dravid and his sacking from the ODI team?  

Special thanks to Sfx for coming up with RD's alter ego.

Comments

India Clothes » Blog Archive » Bollywood alter egos of Cricketers – Part I said:

Pingback from  India Clothes  » Blog Archive   » Bollywood alter egos of Cricketers – Part I

# October 20, 2009 3:14 PM

Krish said:

Good comparison. Naseeruddin Shah is an actor I have always respected. Most of my friends also know and like him in his movies, but he almost never comes up in any discussion about movies. If given a choice between him and some other superstar, people would usually choose the latter, but they are more likely to be satisfied if they went with Naseer.

A lot of movies come to mind. But the best one for me would always be "Masoom".

# October 20, 2009 3:21 PM

namya said:

Krish,

I loved him in Jaane bhi do yaaron. I think his comic timing has been almost completely overlooked in his career. But that's the greatness of these guys.. everyone will have a different favourite role to remember them..

# October 20, 2009 7:02 PM

Som said:

Interesting analogy. Looking forward to the series.

# October 20, 2009 8:41 PM

straight point said:

the last para was killer namaya... sums up both dravid and naseer perfectly...

both made other stars look good...

looking fwd to the series... :)

# October 20, 2009 10:32 PM

namya said:

Som,

welcome to the blog..

SP, Som,

Hopefully the series won't get as boring as the recent Oz England ODI one :)

cheers

# October 21, 2009 10:01 AM

scorpicity said:

Superb comparison... Except Shah wouldn't want to do a role dancing in skimpy outfits and doing dance numbers, whereas Rahul wants to do everything.

# October 28, 2009 10:11 AM

namya said:

Scorpi,

I believe Shah did something similar in Tridev with that ugly cap :)

# October 28, 2009 11:10 AM

scorpicity said:

He did? OMG? Shah is off my list. Nandita das is left and don't ask me why?

# October 29, 2009 6:16 AM

namya said:

Scorpi,

Naseer didn't exactly do item numbers in skimpy clothes :) but that cap in Tirchi Topiwale and his weird outfit basically showed his desire to 'fit in' with the normal Bollywood image. And you HAVE to tell me about Nandita Das now :)

# October 29, 2009 8:39 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)