Not Cricket


http://www.wikio.com web tracker
Listed in LS Blogs the Blog Directory and Blog Search Engine Sports Blogs - Blog Rankings Blog Directory TopBlogDir.blogspot.com button Cricket Blog Directory Visit blogadda.com to discover Indian blogs
Sports & Recreation Directory
Web Directory
Promote Your Blog
This site is listed on OmniCricket

Receive Email Updates

Can also be found at

contact me

Other big hitters I catch

Other non sporting blogs I read

Ashes Fact or Fiction?

 Once upon a time there lived a vain Emperor whose only worry in life was to dress in elegant clothes. He changed clothes almost every hour and loved to show them off to his people.

      Word of the Emperor's refined habits spread over his kingdom and beyond. Two scoundrels who had heard of the Emperor's vanity decided to take advantage of it. They introduced themselves at the gates of the palace with a scheme in mind.

      "We are two very good tailors and after many years of research we have invented an extraordinary method to weave a cloth so light and fine that it looks invisible. As a matter of fact it is invisible to anyone who is too stupid and incompetent to appreciate its quality."

      The chief of the guards heard the scoundrel's strange story and sent for the court chamberlain. The chamberlain notified the prime minister, who ran to the Emperor and disclosed the incredible news. The Emperor's curiosity got the better of him and he decided to see the two scoundrels.

      "Besides being invisible, your Highness, this cloth will be woven in colors and patterns created especially for you." The emperor gave the two men a bag of gold coins in exchange for their promise to begin working on the fabric immediately.

      "Just tell us what you need to get started and we'll give it to you." The two scoundrels asked for a loom, silk, gold thread and then pretended to begin working. The Emperor thought he had spent his money quite well: in addition to getting a new extraordinary suit, he would discover which of his subjects were ignorant and incompetent. A few days later, he called the old and wise prime minister, who was considered by everyone as a man with common sense.

      "Go and see how the work is proceeding," the Emperor told him, "and come back to let me know."

      The prime minister was welcomed by the two scoundrels.

      "We're almost finished, but we need a lot more gold thread. Here, Excellency! Admire the colors, feel the softness!" The old man bent over the loom and tried to see the fabric that was not there. He felt cold sweat on his forehead.

      "I can't see anything," he thought. "If I see nothing, that means I'm stupid! Or, worse, incompetent!" If the prime minister admitted that he didn't see anything, he would be discharged from his office.

      "What a marvelous fabric, he said then. "I'll certainly tell the Emperor." The two scoundrels rubbed their hands gleefully. They had almost made it. More thread was requested to finish the work.

      Finally, the Emperor received the announcement that the two tailors had come to take all the measurements needed to sew his new suit.

      "Come in," the Emperor ordered. Even as they bowed, the two scoundrels pretended to be holding large roll of fabric.

      "Here it is your Highness, the result of our labour," the scoundrels said. "We have worked night and day but, at last, the most beautiful fabric in the world is ready for you. Look at the colors and feel how fine it is." Of course the Emperor did not see any colors and could not feel any cloth between his fingers. He panicked and felt like fainting. But luckily the throne was right behind him and he sat down. But when he realized that no one could know that he did not see the fabric, he felt better. Nobody could find out he was stupid and incompetent. And the Emperor didn't know that everybody else around him thought and did the very same thing.

      The farce continued as the two scoundrels had foreseen it. Once they had taken the measurements, the two began cutting the air with scissors while sewing with their needles an invisible cloth.

      "Your Highness, you'll have to take off your clothes to try on your new ones." The two scoundrels draped the new clothes on him and then held up a mirror. The Emperor was embarrassed but since none of his bystanders were, he felt relieved.

      "Yes, this is a beautiful suit and it looks very good on me," the Emperor said trying to look comfortable. "You've done a fine job."

      "Your Majesty," the prime minister said, "we have a request for you. The people have found out about this extraordinary fabric and they are anxious to see you in your new suit." The Emperor was doubtful showing himself naked to the people, but then he abandoned his fears. After all, no one would know about it except the ignorant and the incompetent.

      "All right," he said. "I will grant the people this privilege." He summoned his carriage and the ceremonial parade was formed. A group of dignitaries walked at the very front of the procession and anxiously scrutinized the faces of the people in the street. All the people had gathered in the main square, pushing and shoving to get a better look. An applause welcomed the regal procession. Everyone wanted to know how stupid or incompetent his or her neighbor was but, as the Emperor passed, a strange murmur rose from the crowd.

      Everyone said, loud enough for the others to hear: "Look at the Emperor's new clothes. They're beautiful!"

      "What a marvellous train!"

      "And the colors! The colors of that beautiful fabric! I have never seen anything like it in my life!" They all tried to conceal their disappointment at not being able to see the clothes, and since nobody was willing to admit his own stupidity and incompetence, they all behaved as the two scoundrels had predicted.

      A child, however, who had no important job and could only see things as his eyes showed them to him, went up to the carriage.

      "The Emperor is naked," he said.

      "Fool!" his father reprimanded, running after him. "Don't talk nonsense!" He grabbed his child and took him away. But the boy's remark, which had been heard by the bystanders, was repeated over and over again until everyone cried:

      "The boy is right! The Emperor is naked! It's true!"

      The Emperor realized that the people were right but could not admit to that. He though it better to continue the procession under the illusion that anyone who couldn't see his clothes was either stupid or incompetent. And he stood stiffly on his carriage, while behind him a page held his imaginary mantle.

 Now everyone has read this story in their childhood days. And oSeeing the hype generated by the media of the two participating countries and the importance attached to that ONE event to the detriment of every thing else (remember how the West Indies series was supposed to be a practice series, World T20 was for those johny come latelys), as an innocent bystander one asks, 'What's so special about this year's Ashes?'

 Michael Atherton had advised the Indian fans to 'grow up' after India's loss in the World T20 because some news channel staged an effigy burning session and some 100+ guys in a country of 1 billion chanted some slogans. One would try and give the same, albeit completely unsolicited (just as Athers' was) advise to the fans and more importantly the experts of both the nations. I would love to see how Atherton himself treats the English team if they go on to lose without a whimper.

Extremity is a relative concept, so is growing up. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist. To write scathing articles in a newspaper or to make some unfairly disparaging comments is as much as an act of a juvenile as a guy burning an effigy for the benefit of a news channel. Both get money from the media owner.

But one is veering  away from the central question (as usual?).

Is the Ashes like the Football World Cup, where as soon as one is over, people start looking at the next one? It seems to be so.Whether rightly or wrongly so, time will tell.

 


Comments

Krish said:

You rightly point out that Atherton writing about this is just as meaningless as the media channel showing burning Dhoni effigies. The media monster needs to be fed. So they have to drum up controversies.

# June 26, 2009 10:27 AM

namya said:

Kris,

First of all, welcome to the blog. The Ashes hype created in the media where there's a report popping up every 30 minutes sounds ridiculous to me. Talks of Sun glasses, visas for a secret getaways, Bopara sound inane. The media circus surrounding the series may end up being the main attraction.

cheers

# June 26, 2009 12:42 PM

Peter said:

Atherton is one of the sharpest writers in cricket. I don't see what the problem is here. He is merely pointing out that outside of the subcontinent, when a country's team loses, specifically his home country of England which loses more than just about anybody, they do not burn effigies of their own players, staged or not. A significant section of India's fans are too emotionally attached to be able to separate themselves and look objectively and with reason at the teams fortunes. I don't recall ever going to a match in England and seeing military men stationed around the boundary or 10 foot high wire fencing to prevent fans from charging onto the field.

# June 26, 2009 1:35 PM

namya said:

Peter,

I don't see what the problem here is.. What Atherton was writing about was one stray incident. The overall reaction in the country was much more muted. No one is debating the volatile nature of the subcontinent fan but I was merely pointing out that the extreme reaction of the media/ blogsphere after England's loss to the Netherlands or Australia's exit from the W T20 was not exactly a paragon of rationality.

The military men that you point out is the local police, and it's more for crowd control which, given India's population and the number of spectators in packed like Sardines, is needed. If you are talking about crowd trouble, it has happened not on the sub continent alone. Australia has now got enouhh security personnel with ferocious looking dogs manning the stands.

You may find Atherton as one of the sharpest writers in world cricket, which is your opinion and you are fully entitled to it. I don't, which I am entitled to have.

Anyways, I was trying to question the hype around the Ashes and whether it's worth it and the Athers article was just an aside.

cheers

# June 26, 2009 1:56 PM

Peter said:

Re Australian security. I don't recall seeing one security officer per fan at the 100,000 seat MCG. However, I see something quite close to that on tv for matches at Eden Gardens.

The main point Atherton is getting at is that Indian fans are not humble in victory, nor should they be. But more importantly, they are not gracious in defeat. They booed Dhoni like crazy at the on field interview after the match against South Africa. Why? Because they are "passionate"? What fan isn't passionate about their team? Despite an absolutely abysmal tour of the West Indies, England fans turned out in droves, outnumbered the home fans, and gave full support to the team.

# June 26, 2009 2:14 PM

namya said:

Peter,

First of all do you admit that 'security' as you call it now is not 'military' which has a completely different connotation. And if you say that there are 100,000 security officers at the Eden Gardens, you may be slightly exaggerating. Or you see a different telecast than what I do.

You were insinuating in your previous comment that the security is to prevent the fans from running on to the ground and hurt the players. And given the turbulent times that the sub continent is going through, isn't it the security advisors of Australia and England who come and ask for maximum security for their players, which is fair enough. But in your opinion if you see security in the stadia we are damned, we are damned if you don't.

About the graciousness in defeat part, do you think the Indian fans don't go and support their team after their team has lost miserably in some series earlier? The graciousness in defeat to me means if you say well played to your opponents and take the defeat sportingly. Tell me one England team/commentator/sharp writer who hasn't blamed the weather/ food/ crowds/ hotels/ beds/ bats/ balls/ reverse swing for their defeat?

Yes, I admit Indian fans react extremely to their own team's defeat. But that behaviour is to their own team because they make their players into demigods.

I wasn't rubbishing what Athers was claiming, but coming from the land of whiners in cricket, it was a bit rich.

# June 26, 2009 2:32 PM

Peter said:

Well for comparisons sake, in the 2nd Test in Adelaide during the Ashes two years ago, England's final day collapse was sparked by a poor umpiring decision by Steve Bucknor to give Andrew Strauss out caught at bat pad when he never touched the ball. However, the focus from the fans, and the press, was how the next 8 wickets fell in spineless fashion due to the brilliance of Warne, as it should have been, instead of blaming Bucknor.

Conversely, when India lost at Sydney. Everyone went berserk at the Australians overappealing (which Kumble and Dhoni were quite good at throughout the series) and demanded Steve Bucknor be removed from umpiring in any other Tests during the series, completely neglecting the fact that India's batting was a complete embarrassment, especially in the final 10 minutes, and no one gave credit to Michael Clarke's one of a kind performance at the end. This also took heat away from the BCCI, when previously Ganguly (and Tendulkar if I remember) had slammed the board after the first test in Melbourne for not scheduling enough practice matches to acclimatise to conditions. Poor umpiring decisions have been part of Test cricket for 130 years, but the only reason why an umpire review system is being put in place now is because India bitched and moaned enough after Sydney. Funnily enough, when the umpire review system was put in place for their Test series a few months later against Sri Lanka, Kumble was completely confused on how to use it and was outfoxed by Jayawardene. The number of successful challenges was something like 20-2 in favor of Sri Lanka.

# June 26, 2009 2:56 PM

namya said:

Huh? Are we shifting goal posts here or what.

I won't get into Sydney gate now and not that I don't feel strongly about it. If you think the English team/ media/ experts haven't been perennial whiners and Indians are, so be it.

If you want to debate on the points that I made, I am happy to engage in one. But it seems pointless to argue on a simple point that I made about the pot calling the kettle black.

cheers and good luck

# June 26, 2009 3:06 PM

Nikhil said:

Endorse ur view completely..I dont know whts so great abt this years Ashes? .. A dilapidated Oz and motley English team tht seems to be playing for one home Ashes series to another home Ashes series.

I dont know whts great abt any Ashes series for tht matter..its hardly a 2 team series.Its a series for Aussies to get their so called individual legedary status against consistent substandard opponents.Post 86-87 only 1 series win in 2005.One single series win tht ranked so high tht the English team actually got to meet the Queen :O..only to whitewashed again!!

In all the years tht I hve grown up watching cricket  WI-Aus/Ind-Pak/Ind-Aus/SA-Aus hve been more intense and relevant cricketing rivalries.

Dont understand the hue and cry .. dont understand the need to cover up disastrous performances over the past 2-3 years by both teams under the facade of 'focussing on the Ashes'

Cheers man ..great choice of topic

# June 27, 2009 8:52 AM

namya said:

Nikhil,

well said :)

# June 27, 2009 10:29 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)